Response Details

Response Details
From Adrian Clarke
Date Started: 05 Oct 2017 13:49. Last modified: 05 Oct 2017 13:49
Status Complete
Response ID #567830

I.

Do you wish to be notified when the recommendations of the person appointed to carry out an independent examination of the Local Plan Part 1 have been published?

You must provide an answer to this question.

  • Yes
  • No

II.

Do you wish to be notified when the Local Plan Part 1 has been adopted?

You must provide an answer to this question.

  • Yes
  • No

III.

Does your representation relate to Addendum to the Sustainability Appraisal?

 

  • Yes
  • No

IV.

Please add any comments in relation to the Addendum to Sustainability Appraisal of the Waverley Local Plan Part 1 in the box below.

«No response»

V.

Does your representation relate to Addendum to the Habitats Regulations Assessment?

  • Yes
  • No

VI.

Please add any comments in relation to the Addendum to the Habitats Regulations Assessment of the Waverley Local Plan Part 1 in the box below.

«No response»

1a.

Does your representation relate to this modification?

  • Yes
  • No

1b.

Please provide the representation policy reference or paragraph number in the box below.

«No response»

1c.

Do you consider this modification to be legally compliant?

  • Yes
  • No

1d.

Do you consider this modification to be sound?

  • Yes
  • No

1e.

If you consider this Main Modification to the Local Plan Part 1 to be unsound, is it because it is not (select as appropriate):

  • Positively Prepared?
  • Justified?
  • Effective?
  • Consistent with National Policy?

1f.

If you consider the Main Modification to be unsound or not legally compliant, please provide details why. Please be as precise as possible. If you wish to support the legal compliance or soundness of the Main Modification, please also use this box.

«No response»

1g.

Please set out what change(s) you consider necessary to make the Main Modification legally compliant or sound, having regard to the matter you have identified in the question above where this related to soundness. You will need to say why this change will make the Main Modification legally compliant or sound. It will be helpful if you are able to put forward your suggested or revised wording. Please be as precise as possible.

«No response»

2a.

Does your representation relate to this modification?

  • Yes
  • No

2b.

Please provide the representation policy reference or paragraph number in the box below.

«No response»

2c.

Do you consider this modification to be legally compliant?

  • Yes
  • No

2d.

Do you consider this modification to be sound?

  • Yes
  • No

2e.

If you consider this Main Modification to the Local Plan Part 1 to be unsound, is it because it is not (select as appropriate):

  • Positively Prepared?
  • Justified?
  • Effective?
  • Consistent with National Policy?

2f.

If you consider this Main Modification to be unsound or not legally compliant, please provide details why. Please be as precise as possible. If you wish to support the legal compliance or soundness of the Main Modification, please also use this box.

«No response»

2g.

Please set out what change(s) you consider necessary to make the Main Modification legally compliant or sound, having regard to the matter you have identified in the question above where this related to soundness. You will need to say why this change will make the Main Modification legally compliant or sound. It will be helpful if you are able to put forward your suggested or revised wording. Please be as precise as possible.

«No response»

3a.

Does your representation relate to this modification?

  • Yes
  • No

3b.

Please provide the representation policy reference or paragraph number in the box below.

«No response»

3c.

Do you consider this modification to be legally compliant?

  • Yes
  • No

3d.

Do you consider this modification to be sound?

  • Yes
  • No

3e.

If you consider this Main Modification to the Local Plan Part 1 to be unsound, is it because it is not (select as appropriate):

  • Positively Prepared?
  • Justified?
  • Effective?
  • Consistent with National Policy?

3f.

If you consider this Main Modification to be unsound or not legally compliant, please provide details why. Please be as precise as possible. If you wish to support the legal compliance or soundness of the Main Modification, please also use this box.

«No response»

3g.

Please set out what change(s) you consider necessary to make the Main Modification legally compliant or sound, having regard to the matter you have identified in the question above where this related to soundness. You will need to say why this change will make the Main Modification legally compliant or sound. It will be helpful if you are able to put forward your suggested or revised wording. Please be as precise as possible.

«No response»

4a.

Does your representation relate to this modification?

  • Yes
  • No

4b.

Please provide the representation policy reference or paragraph number in the box below.

«No response»

4c.

Do you consider this modification to be legally compliant?

  • Yes
  • No

4d.

Do you consider this modification to be sound?

  • Yes
  • No

4e.

If you consider this Main Modification to the Local Plan Part 1 to be unsound, is it because it is not (select as appropriate):

  • Positively Prepared?
  • Justified?
  • Effective?
  • Consistent with National Policy?

4f.

If you consider this Main Modification to be unsound or not legally compliant, please provide details why. Please be as precise as possible. If you wish to support the legal compliance or soundness of the Main Modification, please also use this box.

«No response»

4g.

Please set out what change(s) you consider necessary to make the Main Modification legally compliant or sound, having regard to the matter you have identified in the question above where this related to soundness. You will need to say why this change will make the Main Modification legally compliant or sound. It will be helpful if you are able to put forward your suggested or revised wording. Please be as precise as possible.

«No response»

5a.

Does your representation relate to this modification?

  • Yes
  • No

5b.

Please provide the representation policy reference or paragraph number in the box below.

«No response»

5c.

Do you consider this modification to be legally compliant?

  • Yes
  • No

5d.

Do you consider this modification to be sound?

  • Yes
  • No

5e.

If you consider this Main Modification to the Local Plan Part 1 to be unsound, is it because it is not (select as appropriate):

  • Positively Prepared?
  • Justified?
  • Effective?
  • Consistent with National Policy?

5f.

If you consider this Main Modification to be unsound or not legally compliant, please provide details why. Please be as precise as possible. If you wish to support the legal compliance or soundness of the Main Modification, please also use this box.

«No response»

5g.

Please set out what change(s) you consider necessary to make the Main Modification legally compliant or sound, having regard to the matter you have identified in the question above where this related to soundness. You will need to say why this change will make the Main Modification legally compliant or sound. It will be helpful if you are able to put forward your suggested or revised wording. Please be as precise as possible.

«No response»

6a.

Does your representation relate to this modification?

  • Yes
  • No

6b.

Please provide the representation policy reference or paragraph number in the box below.

«No response»

6c.

Do you consider this modification to be legally compliant?

  • Yes
  • No

6d.

Do you consider this modification to be sound?

  • Yes
  • No

6e.

If you consider this Main Modification to the Local Plan Part 1 to be unsound, is it because it is not (select as appropriate):

  • Positively Prepared?
  • Justified?
  • Effective?
  • Consistent with National Policy?

6f.

If you consider this Main Modification to be unsound or not legally compliant, please provide details why. Please be as precise as possible. If you wish to support the legal compliance or soundness of the Main Modification, please also use this box.

«No response»

6g.

Please set out what change(s) you consider necessary to make the Main Modification legally compliant or sound, having regard to the matter you have identified in the question above where this related to soundness. You will need to say why this change will make the Main Modification legally compliant or sound. It will be helpful if you are able to put forward your suggested or revised wording. Please be as precise as possible.

«No response»

7a.

Does your representation relate to this modification?

  • Yes
  • No

7b.

Please provide the representation policy reference or paragraph number in the box below.

«No response»

7c.

Do you consider this modification to be legally compliant?

  • Yes
  • No

7d.

Do you consider this modification to be sound?

  • Yes
  • No

7e.

If you consider this Main Modification to the Local Plan Part 1 to be unsound, is it because it is not (select as appropriate):

  • Positively Prepared?
  • Justified?
  • Effective?
  • Consistent with National Policy?

7f.

If you consider this Main Modification to be unsound or not legally compliant, please provide details why. Please be as precise as possible. If you wish to support the legal compliance or soundness of the Main Modification, please also use this box.

«No response»

7g.

Please set out what change(s) you consider necessary to make the Main Modification legally compliant or sound, having regard to the matter you have identified in the question above where this related to soundness. You will need to say why this change will make the Main Modification legally compliant or sound. It will be helpful if you are able to put forward your suggested or revised wording. Please be as precise as possible.

«No response»

8a.

Does your representation relate to this modification?

  • Yes
  • No

8b.

Please provide the representation policy reference or paragraph number in the box below.

«No response»

8c.

Do you consider this modification to be legally compliant?

  • Yes
  • No

8d.

Do you consider this modification to be sound?

  • Yes
  • No

8e.

If you consider this Main Modification to the Local Plan Part 1 to be unsound, is it because it is not (select as appropriate):

  • Positively Prepared?
  • Justified?
  • Effective?
  • Consistent with National Policy?

8f.

If you consider this Main Modification to be unsound or not legally compliant, please provide details why. Please be as precise as possible. If you wish to support the legal compliance or soundness of the Main Modification, please also use this box.

«No response»

8g.

Please set out what change(s) you consider necessary to make the Main Modification legally compliant or sound, having regard to the matter you have identified in the question above where this related to soundness. You will need to say why this change will make the Main Modification legally compliant or sound. It will be helpful if you are able to put forward your suggested or revised wording. Please be as precise as possible.

«No response»

9a.

Does your representation relate to this modification?

  • Yes
  • No

9b.

Please provide the representation policy reference or paragraph number in the box below.

«No response»

9c.

Do you consider this modification to be legally compliant?

  • Yes
  • No

9d.

Do you consider this modification to be sound?

  • Yes
  • No

9e.

If you consider this Main Modification to the Local Plan Part 1 to be unsound, is it because it is not (select as appropriate):

  • Positively Prepared?
  • Justified?
  • Effective?
  • Consistent with National Policy?

9f.

If you consider this Main Modification to be unsound or not legally compliant, please provide details why. Please be as precise as possible. If you wish to support the legal compliance or soundness of the Main Modification, please also use this box.

«No response»

9g.

Please set out what change(s) you consider necessary to make the Main Modification legally compliant or sound, having regard to the matter you have identified in the question above where this related to soundness. You will need to say why this change will make the Main Modification legally compliant or sound. It will be helpful if you are able to put forward your suggested or revised wording. Please be as precise as possible.

«No response»

10a.

Does your representation relate to this modification?

  • Yes
  • No

10b.

Please provide the representation policy reference or paragraph number in the box below.

«No response»

10c.

Do you consider this modification to be legally compliant?

  • Yes
  • No

10d.

Do you consider this modification to be sound?

  • Yes
  • No

10e.

If you consider this Main Modification to the Local Plan Part 1 to be unsound, is it because it is not (select as appropriate):

  • Positively Prepared?
  • Justified?
  • Effective?
  • Consistent with National Policy?

10f.

If you consider this Main Modification to be unsound or not legally compliant, please provide details why. Please be as precise as possible. If you wish to support the legal compliance or soundness of the Main Modification, please also use this box.

«No response»

10g.

Please set out what change(s) you consider necessary to make the Main Modification legally compliant or sound, having regard to the matter you have identified in the question above where this related to soundness. You will need to say why this change will make the Main Modification legally compliant or sound. It will be helpful if you are able to put forward your suggested or revised wording. Please be as precise as possible.

«No response»

11a.

Does your representation relate to this modification?

  • Yes
  • No

11b.

Please provide the representation policy reference or paragraph number in the box below.

«No response»

11c.

Do you consider this modification to be legally compliant?

  • Yes
  • No

11d.

Do you consider this modification to be sound?

  • Yes
  • No

11e.

If you consider this Main Modification to the Local Plan Part 1 to be unsound, is it because it is not (select as appropriate):

  • Positively Prepared?
  • Justified?
  • Effective?
  • Consistent with National Policy?

11f.

If you consider this Main Modification to be unsound or not legally compliant, please provide details why. Please be as precise as possible. If you wish to support the legal compliance or soundness of the Main Modification, please also use this box.

«No response»

11g.

Please set out what change(s) you consider necessary to make the Main Modification legally compliant or sound, having regard to the matter you have identified in the question above where this related to soundness. You will need to say why this change will make the Main Modification legally compliant or sound. It will be helpful if you are able to put forward your suggested or revised wording. Please be as precise as possible.

«No response»

12a.

Does your representation relate to this modification?

  • Yes
  • No

12b.

Please provide the representation policy reference or paragraph number in the box below.

«No response»

12c.

Do you consider this modification to be legally compliant?

  • Yes
  • No

12d.

Do you consider this modification to be sound?

  • Yes
  • No

12e.

If you consider this Main Modification to the Local Plan Part 1 to be unsound, is it because it is not (select as appropriate):

  • Positively Prepared?
  • Justified?
  • Effective?
  • Consistent with National Policy?

12f.

If you consider this Main Modification to be unsound or not legally compliant, please provide details why. Please be as precise as possible. If you wish to support the legal compliance or soundness of the Main Modification, please also use this box.

«No response»

12g.

Please set out what change(s) you consider necessary to make the Main Modification legally compliant or sound, having regard to the matter you have identified in the question above where this related to soundness. You will need to say why this change will make the Main Modification legally compliant or sound. It will be helpful if you are able to put forward your suggested or revised wording. Please be as precise as possible.

«No response»

13a.

Does your representation relate to this modification?

  • Yes
  • No

13b.

Please provide the representation policy reference or paragraph number in the box below.

«No response»

13c.

Do you consider this modification to be legally compliant?

  • Yes
  • No

13d.

Do you consider this modification to be sound?

  • Yes
  • No

13e.

If you consider this Main Modification to the Local Plan Part 1 to be unsound, is it because it is not (select as appropriate):

  • Positively Prepared?
  • Justified?
  • Effective?
  • Consistent with National Policy?

13f.

If you consider this Main Modification to be unsound or not legally compliant, please provide details why. Please be as precise as possible. If you wish to support the legal compliance or soundness of the Main Modification, please also use this box.

«No response»

13g.

Please set out what change(s) you consider necessary to make the Main Modification legally compliant or sound, having regard to the matter you have identified in the question above where this related to soundness. You will need to say why this change will make the Main Modification legally compliant or sound. It will be helpful if you are able to put forward your suggested or revised wording. Please be as precise as possible.

«No response»

14a.

Does your representation relate to this modification?

  • Yes
  • No

14b.

Please provide the representation policy reference or paragraph number in the box below.

«No response»

14c.

Do you consider this modification to be legally compliant?

  • Yes
  • No

14d.

Do you consider this modification to be sound?

  • Yes
  • No

14e.

If you consider this Main Modification to the Local Plan Part 1 to be unsound, is it because it is not (select as appropriate):

  • Positively Prepared?
  • Justified?
  • Effective?
  • Consistent with National Policy?

14f.

If you consider this Main Modification to be unsound or not legally compliant, please provide details why. Please be as precise as possible. If you wish to support the legal compliance or soundness of the Main Modification, please also use this box.

«No response»

14g.

Please set out what change(s) you consider necessary to make the Main Modification legally compliant or sound, having regard to the matter you have identified in the question above where this related to soundness. You will need to say why this change will make the Main Modification legally compliant or sound. It will be helpful if you are able to put forward your suggested or revised wording. Please be as precise as possible.

«No response»

15a.

Does your representation relate to this modification?

  • Yes
  • No

15b.

Please provide the representation policy reference or paragraph number in the box below.

«No response»

15c.

Do you consider this modification to be legally compliant?

  • Yes
  • No

15d.

Do you consider this modification to be sound?

  • Yes
  • No

15e.

If you consider this Main Modification to the Local Plan Part 1 to be unsound, is it because it is not (select as appropriate):

  • Positively Prepared?
  • Justified?
  • Effective?
  • Consistent with National Policy?

15f.

If you consider this Main Modification to be unsound or not legally compliant, please provide details why. Please be as precise as possible. If you wish to support the legal compliance or soundness of the Main Modification, please also use this box.

«No response»

15g.

Please set out what change(s) you consider necessary to make the Main Modification legally compliant or sound, having regard to the matter you have identified in the question above where this related to soundness. You will need to say why this change will make the Main Modification legally compliant or sound. It will be helpful if you are able to put forward your suggested or revised wording. Please be as precise as possible.

«No response»

16a.

Does your representation relate to this modification?

  • Yes
  • No

16b.

Please provide the representation policy reference or paragraph number in the box below.

Paragraph number 8

16c.

Do you consider this modification to be legally compliant?

  • Yes
  • No

16d.

Do you consider this modification to be sound?

  • Yes
  • No

16e.

If you consider this Main Modification to the Local Plan Part 1 to be unsound, is it because it is not (select as appropriate):

  • Positively Prepared?
  • Justified?
  • Effective?
  • Consistent with National Policy?

16f.

If you consider this Main Modification to be unsound or not legally compliant, please provide details why. Please be as precise as possible. If you wish to support the legal compliance or soundness of the Main Modification, please also use this box.

Waverley is unable to demonstrate that new dwellings can meet the requirement of 110 litres per person per day.

The high level water cycle study and water quality assessment are based on the old figures in the local plan, and not the new figures set by the Inspector to meet 50% of Woking's unmet housing need. Without running the desktop study again based on the new numbers, Waverley cannot demonstrate that there will be sufficient water to supply the additional homes and that there will not be further negative impact on water quality in the main development areas, which will contravene the Water Framework Directive.

The Water Cycle Study specifically states that "It is critical that future development within the Borough of Waverley must not be responsible for putting unsustainable pressure on the water environment and existing water infrastructure", and it is based only on 519 dwellings per year. The Amec water quality assessment also specifically states that "So long as the proposed housing numbers and growth areas remain the same no further work is required to assess future water quality impacts." This report is also based on lower housing numbers than those now proposed.

At a meeting at Waverley on 25-Sep-17 Chaired by WBC Leader Julia Potts and other senior staff from WBC, and attended by the Environment Agency, Thames Water, AMEC and Cranleigh Civic Society, it was pointed out by the society that the AMEC report is now unsound as a significant amount of extra housing had been added to the original data used as a basis for compiling the report.

WBC was asked to instruct AMEC to re-run their modelling with the new numbers, to see if the water supply and water quality would still meet the requirement stated in the draft Local Plan (i.e. in respect of water quality that the river would comply with Water Framework Directive (WFD)). WBC stated that the responsibility for instructing AMEC to re-run their modelling had passed from WBC to the Inspector, and that Cranleigh Civic Society should ask the Inspector via this formal request process to instruct AMEC to re-run their modelling.

The draft Local Plan is therefore unsound and not legally compliant in this respect as it has not been proven that the projected housing numbers can be built within the timescale set out and within the current identified constraints of water supply and water quality in the Cranleigh area as specifically directed in the NPPF and WFD.The Inspector is respectfully requested to either personally instruct AMEC to do the remodelling or to instruct WBC to arrange for the remodelling to be done and to contact Thames Water to confirm that funding is secured for their plans for their new trunk water supply mains pipe from Netley Mill to Cranleigh and to ensure that the timetable for delivery required for new development matches the new development release schedule.

16g.

Please set out what change(s) you consider necessary to make the Main Modification legally compliant or sound, having regard to the matter you have identified in the question above where this related to soundness. You will need to say why this change will make the Main Modification legally compliant or sound. It will be helpful if you are able to put forward your suggested or revised wording. Please be as precise as possible.

Confirmation from Thames Water that they can meet the water supply demands within the lifetime of the local plan of the new housing numbers in each of the main development areas.

The remodelling of the water quality assessment and water cycle study based on the increased housing numbers and to ascertain the impact on the development areas, including but not limited to water supply and water quality in accordance with current legislation.

17a.

Does your representation relate to this modification?

  • Yes
  • No

17b.

Please provide the representation policy reference or paragraph number in the box below.

«No response»

17c.

Do you consider this modification to be legally compliant?

  • Yes
  • No

17d.

Do you consider this modification to be sound?

  • Yes
  • No

17e.

If you consider this Main Modification to the Local Plan Part 1 to be unsound, is it because it is not (select as appropriate):

  • Positively Prepared?
  • Justified?
  • Effective?
  • Consistent with National Policy?

17f.

If you consider this Main Modification to be unsound or not legally compliant, please provide details why. Please be as precise as possible. If you wish to support the legal compliance or soundness of the Main Modification, please also use this box.

«No response»

17g.

Please set out what change(s) you consider necessary to make the Main Modification legally compliant or sound, having regard to the matter you have identified in the question above where this related to soundness. You will need to say why this change will make the Main Modification legally compliant or sound. It will be helpful if you are able to put forward your suggested or revised wording. Please be as precise as possible.

«No response»

18a.

Does your representation relate to this modification?

  • Yes
  • No

18b.

Please provide the representation policy reference or paragraph number in the box below.

«No response»

18c.

Do you consider this modification to be legally compliant?

  • Yes
  • No

18d.

Do you consider this modification to be sound?

  • Yes
  • No

18e.

If you consider this Main Modification to the Local Plan Part 1 to be unsound, is it because it is not (select as appropriate):

  • Positively Prepared?
  • Justified?
  • Effective?
  • Consistent with National Policy?

18f.

If you consider this Main Modification to be unsound or not legally compliant, please provide details why. Please be as precise as possible. If you wish to support the legal compliance or soundness of the Main Modification, please also use this box.

«No response»

18g.

Please set out what change(s) you consider necessary to make the Main Modification legally compliant or sound, having regard to the matter you have identified in the question above where this related to soundness. You will need to say why this change will make the Main Modification legally compliant or sound. It will be helpful if you are able to put forward your suggested or revised wording. Please be as precise as possible.

«No response»

19a.

Does your representation relate to this modification?

  • Yes
  • No

19b.

Please provide the representation policy reference or paragraph number in the box below.

«No response»

19c.

Do you consider this modification to be legally compliant?

  • Yes
  • No

19d.

Do you consider this modification to be sound?

  • Yes
  • No

19e.

If you consider this Main Modification to the Local Plan Part 1 to be unsound, is it because it is not (select as appropriate):

  • Positively Prepared?
  • Justified?
  • Effective?
  • Consistent with National Policy?

19f.

If you consider this Main Modification to be unsound or not legally compliant, please provide details why. Please be as precise as possible. If you wish to support the legal compliance or soundness of the Main Modification, please also use this box.

«No response»

19g.

Please set out what change(s) you consider necessary to make the Main Modification legally compliant or sound, having regard to the matter you have identified in the question above where this related to soundness. You will need to say why this change will make the Main Modification legally compliant or sound. It will be helpful if you are able to put forward your suggested or revised wording. Please be as precise as possible.

«No response»

20a.

Does your representation relate to this modification?

  • Yes
  • No

20b.

Please provide the representation policy reference or paragraph number in the box below.

«No response»

20c.

Do you consider this modification to be legally compliant?

  • Yes
  • No

20d.

Do you consider this modification to be sound?

  • Yes
  • No

20e.

If you consider this Main Modification to the Local Plan Part 1 to be unsound, is it because it is not (select as appropriate):

  • Positively Prepared?
  • Justified?
  • Effective?
  • Consistent with National Policy?

20f.

If you consider this Main Modification to be unsound or not legally compliant, please provide details why. Please be as precise as possible. If you wish to support the legal compliance or soundness of the Main Modification, please also use this box.

«No response»

20g.

Please set out what change(s) you consider necessary to make the Main Modification legally compliant or sound, having regard to the matter you have identified in the question above where this related to soundness. You will need to say why this change will make the Main Modification legally compliant or sound. It will be helpful if you are able to put forward your suggested or revised wording. Please be as precise as possible.

«No response»

21a.

Does your representation relate to this modification?

  • Yes
  • No

21b.

Please provide the representation policy reference or paragraph number in the box below.

«No response»

21c.

Do you consider this modification to be legally compliant?

  • Yes
  • No

21d.

Do you consider this modification to be sound?

  • Yes
  • No

21e.

If you consider this Main Modification to the Local Plan Part 1 to be unsound, is it because it is not (select as appropriate):

  • Positively Prepared?
  • Justified?
  • Effective?
  • Consistent with National Policy?

21f.

If you consider this Main Modification to be unsound or not legally compliant, please provide details why. Please be as precise as possible. If you wish to support the legal compliance or soundness of the Main Modification, please also use this box.

«No response»

21g.

Please set out what change(s) you consider necessary to make the Main Modification legally compliant or sound, having regard to the matter you have identified in the question above where this related to soundness. You will need to say why this change will make the Main Modification legally compliant or sound. It will be helpful if you are able to put forward your suggested or revised wording. Please be as precise as possible.

«No response»

22a.

Does your representation relate to this modification?

  • Yes
  • No

22b.

Please provide the representation policy reference or paragraph number in the box below.

«No response»

22c.

Do you consider this modification to be legally compliant?

  • Yes
  • No

22d.

Do you consider this modification to be sound?

  • Yes
  • No

22e.

If you consider this Main Modification to the Local Plan Part 1 to be unsound, is it because it is not (select as appropriate):

  • Positively Prepared?
  • Justified?
  • Effective?
  • Consistent with National Policy?

22f.

If you consider this Main Modification to be unsound or not legally compliant, please provide details why. Please be as precise as possible. If you wish to support the legal compliance or soundness of the Main Modification, please also use this box.

«No response»

22g.

Please set out what change(s) you consider necessary to make the Main Modification legally compliant or sound, having regard to the matter you have identified in the question above where this related to soundness. You will need to say why this change will make the Main Modification legally compliant or sound. It will be helpful if you are able to put forward your suggested or revised wording. Please be as precise as possible.

«No response»

23a.

Does your representation relate to this modification?

  • Yes
  • No

23b.

Please provide the representation policy reference or paragraph number in the box below.

«No response»

23c.

Do you consider this modification to be legally compliant?

  • Yes
  • No

23d.

Do you consider this modification to be sound?

  • Yes
  • No

23e.

If you consider this Main Modification to the Local Plan Part 1 to be unsound, is it because it is not (select as appropriate):

  • Positively Prepared?
  • Justified?
  • Effective?
  • Consistent with National Policy?

23f.

If you consider this Main Modification to be unsound or not legally compliant, please provide details why. Please be as precise as possible. If you wish to support the legal compliance or soundness of the Main Modification, please also use this box.

«No response»

23g.

Please set out what change(s) you consider necessary to make the Main Modification legally compliant or sound, having regard to the matter you have identified in the question above where this related to soundness. You will need to say why this change will make the Main Modification legally compliant or sound. It will be helpful if you are able to put forward your suggested or revised wording. Please be as precise as possible.

«No response»

Accompanying Documents.

Please provide any additional documents or images to accompany your comments. Please indicate which Main Modification(s) your additional documents relate to.  

You can upload up to 10 files.

«No files»